Cyber Crimes - an Overview and the Measures
1. The synopsis of technology solutions Article.Information has opened a way for a new world of Internet, network business and e-business? banking, sprouting as a solution to reduce costs, changing economic affairs specialist with the method pi? easy, pi? Fast, efficient and time-saving transactions. The Internet? As they emerged? a blessing for the current pace of life but at the same time also caused the various threats against consumers and other institutions so? of? of it? s? found to be pi? favorable. The various criminal Gradica the reprogramming, crackers have been opening their way to interfere with customers of the internet with various techniques such as engraving the domain name server (DNS), the address of? s (IP) of? Provider? Internet, spoofing, phishing, phishing and so on the Internet. and have succeeded in gain? unauthorized use of? of access? of? of? of? to the system? s? the user? and useful data stolen to earn huge profits from customers? s? the customer?. The intentional use of information technology by terrorists to cyber for the production of destructive and harmful effects to the property? defined and intangible than others? called? of? the crime? of the cyber? of? of?. The Cyber crime? clearly an international problem without national boundaries. The incision attacks pu? be launched from all corners of the world without any fear of continued tracing or easily. The terrorist Cyber pu? sink the economic structure of a country from a place where the country could not be certain how? of? of the treaty? extradition of? of? of? to deal with the criminal. The only safeguard would be the best technology to combat that technology already? changing and known for reprogramming. But that threat has yet to be detected by computer criminals of intellect. This paper contributes an understanding of the effects of negative use of information technology and how far the current law in India can dealing with publishing and what sense? the legal structure that holds up to put brake on crime. The potential changes needed in the system and in accordance combat cyber terrorism that has transactions in a safe and trusted. Bench? There are many techniques for changing the brake put activity? criminals from cyber terrorists, but the problem still persists in legal and non? managed to produce an effect on trattenente criminals. If the suggestions are taken in the light of the conclusion we can? be better coordination between the various national and international agencies to make the system more? 2000 Law and efficient information technology and ensured a trust. Pu? still be considered good for items that had existed to provide benefits to society?. This paper? contributory to the fact that Finch? the rate of crime? not? place brake technology can not? produce benefits for which sufficient? s? of it? created.2 state. What? Cyber crime? The Cyber terrorists usually use the computer because? a tool, a target, or both for their illegal act one or the other to obtain information that may cause great loss / damage to the owner of those intangible sensitive information. The Internet? one of the means by which the offender may obtain such information sensitive to prices of firms, companies, individuals, the bank, crimes of property? intellectual (like stealing programs, new product, its description, the programs market program, list of customers etc.), selling illegal items, pornography and so on. this? made with several methods such as phishing, spoofing, pharming, phising Internet, wire transfer so. and uses it to their own advantage without the consent of the individual. Many banks, financial institutions, investment houses, etc. brokering companies. perseguitande are unfairly and minacciande by cyber terrorists to pay extortion money to keep their sensitive information intact to avoid enormous damage. E? s? of it? reported that many institutions in the United States, Great Britain and Europe have paid secret to prevent the merger or the huge collapse of trust between their consumers.2.2. The emergence of the Information Technology Act, 2000.In India, the 2000 Law of information technology? were promulgated after the resolution of the General Assembly A/RES/51/162 nation united, dated January 30 1997 by adopting the Model Law on Electronic Commerce adopted by the UN Commission on International Trade Law. There? was the first point to the law on electronic commerce at the international level to regulate an alternative form of trade and to give him legal status in the area of electronic commerce. He was taken promulgated in the model account UNICITRAL law on electronic commerce 1996.3. Some major provisions under the information technology act, 2000.Sec.43Damage the computer system so. Compensation for 1crore rupees. Sec.66Hacking (with intention or knowledge) for 2 lakh of rupees and imprisonment for 3 years. Sec.67Publication of obscene material in an e-formFine of 1 lakh rupees and imprisonment of 5years and double conviction on the second offenceSec.68Not joining under controllerFine up to 2 lakh and an imprisonment of 3 years. Access fixing or Sec.70attempting to computerImprisonment up to 10 years. Sec.72For that breaks the confidentiality of information computerFine up to 1 lakh and dell'imprigionamento up to 2 digital signatures of yearsSec.73Publishing false, false in certain particularsFine 1 lakh, or an imprisonment of 2 years or both. Sec.74Publication signatures of Digitahi for fraudulent purposes. Imprisonment for a term of 2 years and fees? 1 lakh rupees.4. The types of attacks by Hackers.Hacker? specialist in the field of computer that uses his knowledge to gain unauthorized access to computer network. The? s? He of? not everyone who wishes to cross the system but also include those who do not have an intention to damage the system but to learn more? using the calculator? s? of one?. The? 2000? the doesn? Law technology transforms t incision for an offense but if the eyes of the factor of mens rea. I use cracker hand over the severed because of the information network for personal and political reasons. Affecting a member or an employee? quite prominent in the current date. Part 66 (b) of the Information Technology Act 2000, provides for punishment dell'imprigionamento term of 3 years and fees? who can? limit of two lakhs of rupees, or for bothBanks and other financial institutions are threatened by terrorist groups to use their sensitive information resulting in great loss and in turn to ask the quantity? redemption from them. There are several methods used by reprogrammed to gain unauthorized access to computers as well as use of viruses such as worms and Trojan so. Therefore, if anyone fixed access to any computer without the permission of the owner will? liable to pay damages of rupees UN crore under the Information Technology Act, 2000. The system here means a device including devices and systems support and input of removal that are capable of recording logic, arithmetic, research data and conduct, control communication and other functions but excludes computers . Unauthorized access within the part 43 of Act 2000 of technology? punishable regardless of the intention or the purpose for which unauthorized access to computer system? been done. The? t of? the needn? the owner demonstrates the fact of loss, but the fact used without his permission. The case of rice in the United States v. it would be important in this sense where the defender on the request of his friend (who had been under consideration by a the IRS) tried to find the condition of his case? s? the friend? using the calculator? s? the officer? without his consent. Bench? Because of? t of? of didn? all the damage / loss of the plaintiff (official) but is convicted by the jury to access the computer system of a government without its authority? and his conviction pi? late? been confirmed. Even if one provides any assistance to any gain unauthorized access to computer sar? liable to pay compensation for damage via 1 crore rupees. Does turning the computer leads to unauthorized access? On the mens rea in Part 1 of the Law of computer misuse, 1990 contains two elements l? intention must be to ensure access to any program or data held in any computer and the person must know that seeks to ensure unauthorized access. for example. When the defenders went to his ex used to buy certain equipment and the sales person were not watching him have been cited for locking in some automatic orders to work on allocated considerable granted. Part 1 (1) (a) requires? of? of? that the second computer should be? of? the involved? but the judiciary in the case of R v. Sean Cropp, believed that the Parliament intends to limit the offense even if the single computer system was involved. A) computer viruses: Viruses are used by Hackers infecting the computer data and the damage? s? the user? stored on the computer through? of? Payload? of? the? of? in virus carrying the offensive code. The person is responsible under the law of IT only when the consent of the owner? taken prior to the virus in his system. The contradiction here? that even if temporary interruption of specific causes of the virus showing messages on the screen of the law but still not punishable under 2000 of technology? s? of it? it defined as damage to the cause? t of? the doesn?. But, should be made punishable because? Because part of unauthorized? t of? the doesn? of? of? of access? of? of? of? however, all the damage. I also fall harmless virus used in the expression? of? of? unsurp to measure the performance of normal? of? computer, system or network?. This ambiguit? needs review. B) Phishing: Using e-mails that completely resembles the original mail messages from customers, the reprogrammed may request verification of certain information, such as customer numbers and customer passwords and so on. here could not have known that e-mails are deceiving and would not be able to identify the originalit? messages, this causes huge loss finanziera when reprogrammed using that information for fraudulent acts such as the withdrawal of monetary